Impact

Potential benefits Pipelytica can bring to pipe inspection work. Numbers are illustrative scenarios – your own results depend on video quality and workflow.

~60–70%
Faster documentation
BEFORE

Manual video review + reporting: typically 4–6 hours per site

AFTER

AI analysis + automatic report: under 1 hour per site in our example scenario

Free up inspector time for field work. AI reviews the video, proposes findings, and drafts the report – the inspector confirms each finding.

~90%
AI accuracy
BEFORE

Humans detect 80–90% of defects (fatigue and experience matter)

AFTER

Multi-model ensemble reaches 93%+ classification accuracy (validation result – see per-class table on Features page)

AI finds defects the human eye misses due to fatigue. Continuous learning means the model can still be wrong – the inspector confirms every finding before the report goes out.

Significant
Cost reduction
BEFORE

Unclear findings lead to revisits and extra documentation

AFTER

Better visual documentation and colour-coded condition maps reduce revisits

Actual savings depend on your company's site volume and labor rate – estimate your own with the ROI calculator.

EN 13508-2
Standard compliance
BEFORE

Reports don't always meet standard requirements

AFTER

Automatic EN 13508-2 compliance in every report

DXF export with AutoCAD compatibility. Standard-compliant PDF reports in one click.

Consistent
Report quality
BEFORE

Report quality varies with inspector experience and alertness

AFTER

AI baseline + templates give every report the same structure

AI analysis + 26 architecture checks + templates = a consistent starting point the inspector finalizes.

2–4×
More projects
BEFORE

Inspector typically handles 2–3 reports per day

AFTER

AI-assisted: 6–10 reports per day in our example scenario

Same team can handle several times the project volume without additional hires. Numbers are illustrative – your result depends on your workflow.

What our AI can detect

Real validation numbers, not marketing promises. Every percentage measured on a held-out validation set.

Per-class classification accuracy

Class-by-class breakdown · 37 luokkaa · validoitu 14 706 kuvalla

Continuously learningOur models learn from every inspection – every approved or rejected finding improves accuracy automatically.

AI can make mistakesBecause the models are continuously learning, they can make mistakes. Always verify findings before delivering a report to a customer.

27

classes ≥ 90%

3

classes 80–90%

7

classes < 80% (need more data)

Mallin tarkkuus paranee korkeammalla videoresoluutiolla. 720p+ suositeltu; alle 480p videot voivat johtaa vääriin positiivisiin tuloksiin.

Validointi: 25.4.2026 · 14 706 kuvaa

Example calculation (not an actual customer): inspection company, 500 sites/year

Without Pipelytica

Documentation/site4h
Reporting/site3h
Work hours/year3500h
Missed defects8-12%
Revisits needed25%
Labor costs€175 000

With Pipelytica

Documentation/site45min
Reporting/site15min
Work hours/year500h
Missed defects<2%
Revisits needed5%
Labor costs€25 000
Example: ~€150,000 savings/year
+ ~3,000 work hours freed up (illustrative)

Calculate your savings

Start a free trial and see how much your company benefits.

Start now